On hiatus

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

Public Smoking Ban in Illinois

Illinois lawmakers have voted to ban smoking in most public places. Some thoughts...

*Beyond the occasional toke, chain smoking is probably the most disgusting habit I can name.
*This ban will only affect businesses that have thusfar been too dumb to not ride the fence. When a bar permits smoking, their only patrons are regular smokers. When a bar doesn't permit it, only non-smokers regular patronize the business. For businesses that have attempted to be all for all, this ban will hurt them.
*I couldn't care less. They should have known being one or the other was the way to go five years ago.
*Says Illinois State Rep. Karen Yarbrough, D-Chicago, "[Vote for the ban] for the people who work in these places." Um, I dig the ban, but folks who work in bars and restaurants are big boys and girls; they can either take it or quit. Or...
*If this were 50 years ago, they can talk to their union rep. For whatever reason, unions in private, non-trade sectors have taken a dip...
*Madison recently enacted a similar city-wide ban. The Wisconsin Restaurant Association recently voted, almost unanimously, to favor a statewide ban. Many bar and restaurant owners would prefer to allow the free market to dictate where folks can smoke, but when an establishment is on the outskirts of a municipality that has enacted a ban, they can't compete. That's why a statewide resolution is key.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes, an interesting topic. No idea where I stand on it either. I enjoy going out to non-smoky places much more, but I am not a smoker. One question: Wouldn't the ban theoretically hurt bars who were off the fence and permitted smokers? Doesn't smoking ban mean these patrons wouldn't be able to smoke there and may (keyword MAY) lose business if those patrons stay home? I know my father for one would just stay home if Wisconsin had a smoking ban. How would it affect the fence-riders more since they would have at least a portion of their patrons sure to stay? Again, all theoretical.

10:37 AM

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home